summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/main.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authormjkwiatkowski <mati.rewa@gmail.com>2026-06-28 18:17:23 +0200
committermjkwiatkowski <mati.rewa@gmail.com>2026-06-28 18:17:23 +0200
commitee72786e62f74062204f8830aa965131a5c0686d (patch)
treec5c8dbf31cd1ee708c06de190c68a8dad57a87f7 /main.tex
parent385f9375aa7a4c211cb577a71406bf8a7c32ba54 (diff)
feat: added the last figure
Diffstat (limited to 'main.tex')
-rw-r--r--main.tex6
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/main.tex b/main.tex
index 32b7591..d1b8bc0 100644
--- a/main.tex
+++ b/main.tex
@@ -6,8 +6,7 @@
\begin{frame}\frametitle{Motivation}
\begin{tcolorbox}[title=Context]
- 21\textsuperscript{st} century datacenters (DC) are mostly heterogeneous~\cite{DBLP:conf/date/MilojicicFDR21} and
- modern computational needs of AI drive managers to diversify datacenters even more~\cite{DBLP:journals/computer/AthavaleBBMMPS24}.
+ 21\textsuperscript{st} century datacenters (DC) are mostly heterogeneous~\cite{DBLP:conf/date/MilojicicFDR21} and modern computational needs of AI drive managers to diversify them even more~\cite{DBLP:journals/computer/AthavaleBBMMPS24}.
In result datacenters become extremely complex and hard to operate with millions of CPU's, GPU's etc.
\end{tcolorbox}
\begin{center}
@@ -68,7 +67,6 @@
\begin{frame}\frametitle{\textbf{RQ1}: Literature Review II}
% Mandatory: split the figure into 2: top and bottom, and that way you can fill in the entire slide nicely.
-
\begin{tcolorbox}[title=A holistic DCDT system model]
We propose a holistic model of datacenter digital twinning that can be mapped to each system from \textbf{Table 1.1}. Within this model (see \textbf{Fig. 1.3}) we introduce a concept of the \emph{Digital Thread}: a bridge between the DCDT and the physical DC equipment.
\end{tcolorbox}
@@ -181,7 +179,7 @@
\end{center}
\vspace{-0.3cm}
\tiny
- \textbf{Figure 1.7b:} Experiment 1b. The mean failure detection rate is around 15\%. Even though this seems low, if we look at \textbf{Fig. E.1} (see Extra Slides), this simply means around 15\% of failures are unexpected.
+ \textbf{Figure 1.7b:} Experiment 1b. The mean failure detection rate is around 12\%. Even though this seems low, if we look at \textbf{Fig. E.1} (see Extra Slides), this simply means around 12\% of failures are unexpected.
\end{minipage}
% Explain what the axis are in the figure caption.
% Talk about the experimental setup in the figure.