summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--citations/LiBUILDSYS2023.pdf (renamed from citations2/iteration1/acm/3600100.3623719.pdf)bin3047370 -> 3047370 bytes
-rw-r--r--content/background.tex4
-rw-r--r--main.bib19
-rw-r--r--notes/meetin2.txt6
-rw-r--r--sources/dt_features_comparison.tex38
5 files changed, 48 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/citations2/iteration1/acm/3600100.3623719.pdf b/citations/LiBUILDSYS2023.pdf
index a442e3d..a442e3d 100644
--- a/citations2/iteration1/acm/3600100.3623719.pdf
+++ b/citations/LiBUILDSYS2023.pdf
Binary files differ
diff --git a/content/background.tex b/content/background.tex
index fc1fce7..4218380 100644
--- a/content/background.tex
+++ b/content/background.tex
@@ -47,6 +47,10 @@ The digital twin is designed to provide extra datasets for training \gls{ai} mod
DyTwin~\cite{DBLP:conf/sc/TaheriBPRHDEWPM24} is an adaptive digital twin with visualization and anomaly detection features.
+% What is more, Microsoft already offers digital twinning as a service https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/digital-twins/
+% Documentation: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/digital-twins/
+% Moreover, NVIDIA is doing too as well https://www.nvidia.com/en-sg/omniverse/
+
Predictive modelling uses statistics to predict outcomes.
When deployed commercially, for example in datacenters, predictive modelling is often referred to as predictive analytics~\cite{Wikipedia:PredictiveModelling}.
Almost any statistical model can be used for prediction purposes, but nowadays predictive analysis is synonymous with machine learning.
diff --git a/main.bib b/main.bib
index 7053672..285859d 100644
--- a/main.bib
+++ b/main.bib
@@ -554,3 +554,22 @@
biburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/conf/sc/TaheriBPRHDEWPM24.bib},
bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org},
}
+
+@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/sensys/LiW0Z0T23,
+ author = {Minghao Li and Ruihang Wang and Xin Zhou and Zhaomeng Zhu and
+ Yonggang Wen and Rui Tan},
+ title = {ChatTwin: Toward Automated Digital Twin Generation for Data
+ Center via Large Language Models},
+ booktitle = {Proceedings of the 10th {ACM} International Conference on
+ Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and
+ Transportation, BuildSys 2023, Istanbul, Turkey, November
+ 15-16, 2023},
+ pages = {208--211},
+ publisher = {{ACM}},
+ year = {2023},
+ url = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3600100.3623719},
+ doi = {10.1145/3600100.3623719},
+ timestamp = {Tue, 13 May 2025 13:47:03 +0200},
+ biburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/conf/sensys/LiW0Z0T23.bib},
+ bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org},
+}
diff --git a/notes/meetin2.txt b/notes/meetin2.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6ed2515
--- /dev/null
+++ b/notes/meetin2.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+Servo paper: this is the kind of system model you have to do.
+A reference architecture.
+The design is more specific than the reference architecture.
+The contribution of RQ1 should be a system model.
+The abstraction level goes: system model/reference architecture -> system design -> prototype implementation
+There is also taxonomy: Procedural Content Generation for Games -> taxonomy of different types of content.
diff --git a/sources/dt_features_comparison.tex b/sources/dt_features_comparison.tex
index be53e13..2bc3305 100644
--- a/sources/dt_features_comparison.tex
+++ b/sources/dt_features_comparison.tex
@@ -1,26 +1,26 @@
\begin{table}[t]
\centering
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.4}
- \begin{tabular}{m{0.4\linewidth}cccc}
+ \begin{tabular}{m{0.4\linewidth}ccccc}
\toprule
- Feature & ExaDigiT~\cite{DBLP:conf/sc/BrewerMKWBHSGGW24} & SmartDC~\cite{DBLP:conf/noms/ZhangZLZWC22} & DyTwin~\cite{DBLP:conf/sc/TaheriBPRHDEWPM24} \\
- \midrule
- Virtual Prototyping & & \ding{51} & \\
- Scenario Exploration & & & \\
- 3D Facility Modelling & \ding{51} & \ding{51} & \\
- Predictive maintenance & & & \\
- Predictive energy modelling & & \ding{51} & \\
- Reliability and availability modeling & & & \\
- Cooling system modelling & & \ding{51} & \\
- Network modelling & & & \\
- Predictive modelling & & & \\
- Power/Energy consumption optimization (PUE) & & \ding{51} & \\
- Heat and Airflow distribution modelling & & \ding{51} & \\
- Visual analytics dashboard & & & \\
- Forensic analysis and diagnostics & & & \\
- Failure detection & & & \\
- Operational optimization & & & \\
- Resource allocation & & & \\
+ Feature & ExaDigiT~\cite{DBLP:conf/sc/BrewerMKWBHSGGW24} & SmartDC~\cite{DBLP:conf/noms/ZhangZLZWC22} & DyTwin~\cite{DBLP:conf/sc/TaheriBPRHDEWPM24} & ChatTwin~\cite{DBLP:conf/sensys/LiW0Z0T23}\\
+ \midrule
+ Virtual Prototyping & & \ding{51} & &\\
+ Scenario Exploration & & & &\\
+ 3D Facility Modelling & \ding{51} & \ding{51} & &\\
+ Predictive maintenance & & & &\\
+ Predictive energy modelling & & \ding{51} & &\\
+ Reliability and availability modeling & & & &\\
+ Cooling system modelling & & \ding{51} & &\\
+ Network modelling & & & &\\
+ Predictive modelling & & & &\\
+ Power/Energy consumption optimization (PUE) & & \ding{51} & &\\
+ Heat and Airflow distribution modelling & & \ding{51} & &\\
+ Visual analytics dashboard & & & &\\
+ Forensic analysis and diagnostics & & & &\\
+ Failure detection & & & &\\
+ Operational optimization & & & &\\
+ Resource allocation & & & &\\
\midrule
\end{tabular}
\caption{Comparison of selected features of existing datacenter digital twins.}