summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authormjkwiatkowski <mati.rewa@gmail.com>2026-06-06 08:39:31 +0200
committermjkwiatkowski <mati.rewa@gmail.com>2026-06-06 08:39:31 +0200
commit980c99a32e09273039b918f4d15692fc41140f1c (patch)
treea59594efe9ace30fa220ba065b295d46f841e3aa
parent5c1b9d04bbe46b33820b66fc0dedc2b18af066a0 (diff)
fix: changed the methodology section
-rw-r--r--content/intro.tex16
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/content/intro.tex b/content/intro.tex
index 8f2e550..35ff21e 100644
--- a/content/intro.tex
+++ b/content/intro.tex
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ We propose that digital twinning can be enhanced by integrating predictive analy
\noindent We divide the problem of designing a predictive \gls{dcdt} into three research questions:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\emph{RQ\textsubscript{\arabic*}}, align=left, itemsep=0pt]
% First research question stolen from Capelin by Georgios Andreadis and adapted to my work.
- \item \emph{How capture and assess the current state-of-the-art of digital twinning for datacenters?}\\
+ \item \emph{How to assess the current state-of-the-art of digital twinning for datacenters?}\\
There is currently a lack of a unified system model of what constitutes a \gls{dcdt}, and the differences between existing \gls{dcdt} deployments.
It is necessary that we establish a common model of a \gls{dcdt} in the research community.
We must develop a holistic \gls{dcdt} model that factors in the necessary components of a \gls{dt}.
@@ -112,11 +112,15 @@ We propose that digital twinning can be enhanced by integrating predictive analy
%We conduct a review of literature of closely-related fields as well as separate engineering science such as aerospace engineering.
% This will aid in identifying the most important use-cases for digital twins and in return, the crucial functional and non-functional requirements.
% We analyze the found use-cases in the context of datacenters or brainstorm how we can adapt them to datacenters.
-To answer \emph{RQ\textsubscript{1}} we conduct a standard literature review as proposed by \textit{Kitchenham et al.} \cite{DBLP:journals/infsof/KitchenhamPBBTNL10} along with the guidance of the supervisor.
-Firstly, we specify the review research questions and determine the right review method.
-Secondly, we conduct the review and find the potential datacenter digital twin use-cases.
-This includes summaries of a selection of relevant articles and their findings.
-Lastly, based on the found use-cases, we formulate the functional and non-functional requirements for the predictive \gls{dcdt} reference architecture.
+To answer \emph{RQ\textsubscript{1}} we conduct a literature review as proposed by \textit{Kitchenham et al.} \cite{DBLP:journals/infsof/KitchenhamPBBTNL10} along with the guidance of the supervisor.
+Firstly, we determine the right review method.
+Secondly, we identify the various works related to \gls{dcdt}'s using various search strings
+(\eg ``Datacenter Digital Twinning'', ``ICT Virtual Twin'').
+To search for the results we use the digital libraries of Google Scholar, DBLP, ACM Digital Library, IEEExplore, Springer \etc
+Thirdly, we select work relevant to our research and organize the details of each article.
+A potential outcome of this could be a system model for \gls{dcdt}'s.
+We envision the literature review can supply us with potential use-cases for the predictive \gls{dcdt}.
+Based on the found use-cases, we formulate the functional and non-functional requirements for the predictive \gls{dcdt} reference architecture.
To answer \emph{RQ\textsubscript{2}} we closely follow the \textit{AtLarge Design Process} \cite{DBLP:conf/icdcs/IosupVTETBFMT19} under the guidance of the supervisor, and propose a simulation-based \gls{dcdt} system that meets the requirements listed as a part of \emph{RQ\textsubscript{1}}.
Firstly, following the literature review, we list the functional and non-functional requirements of a predictive \gls{dcdt}.