diff options
| author | mjkwiatkowski <mati.rewa@gmail.com> | 2026-06-06 08:39:31 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | mjkwiatkowski <mati.rewa@gmail.com> | 2026-06-06 08:39:31 +0200 |
| commit | 980c99a32e09273039b918f4d15692fc41140f1c (patch) | |
| tree | a59594efe9ace30fa220ba065b295d46f841e3aa | |
| parent | 5c1b9d04bbe46b33820b66fc0dedc2b18af066a0 (diff) | |
fix: changed the methodology section
| -rw-r--r-- | content/intro.tex | 16 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/content/intro.tex b/content/intro.tex index 8f2e550..35ff21e 100644 --- a/content/intro.tex +++ b/content/intro.tex @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ We propose that digital twinning can be enhanced by integrating predictive analy \noindent We divide the problem of designing a predictive \gls{dcdt} into three research questions: \begin{enumerate}[label=\emph{RQ\textsubscript{\arabic*}}, align=left, itemsep=0pt] % First research question stolen from Capelin by Georgios Andreadis and adapted to my work. - \item \emph{How capture and assess the current state-of-the-art of digital twinning for datacenters?}\\ + \item \emph{How to assess the current state-of-the-art of digital twinning for datacenters?}\\ There is currently a lack of a unified system model of what constitutes a \gls{dcdt}, and the differences between existing \gls{dcdt} deployments. It is necessary that we establish a common model of a \gls{dcdt} in the research community. We must develop a holistic \gls{dcdt} model that factors in the necessary components of a \gls{dt}. @@ -112,11 +112,15 @@ We propose that digital twinning can be enhanced by integrating predictive analy %We conduct a review of literature of closely-related fields as well as separate engineering science such as aerospace engineering. % This will aid in identifying the most important use-cases for digital twins and in return, the crucial functional and non-functional requirements. % We analyze the found use-cases in the context of datacenters or brainstorm how we can adapt them to datacenters. -To answer \emph{RQ\textsubscript{1}} we conduct a standard literature review as proposed by \textit{Kitchenham et al.} \cite{DBLP:journals/infsof/KitchenhamPBBTNL10} along with the guidance of the supervisor. -Firstly, we specify the review research questions and determine the right review method. -Secondly, we conduct the review and find the potential datacenter digital twin use-cases. -This includes summaries of a selection of relevant articles and their findings. -Lastly, based on the found use-cases, we formulate the functional and non-functional requirements for the predictive \gls{dcdt} reference architecture. +To answer \emph{RQ\textsubscript{1}} we conduct a literature review as proposed by \textit{Kitchenham et al.} \cite{DBLP:journals/infsof/KitchenhamPBBTNL10} along with the guidance of the supervisor. +Firstly, we determine the right review method. +Secondly, we identify the various works related to \gls{dcdt}'s using various search strings +(\eg ``Datacenter Digital Twinning'', ``ICT Virtual Twin''). +To search for the results we use the digital libraries of Google Scholar, DBLP, ACM Digital Library, IEEExplore, Springer \etc +Thirdly, we select work relevant to our research and organize the details of each article. +A potential outcome of this could be a system model for \gls{dcdt}'s. +We envision the literature review can supply us with potential use-cases for the predictive \gls{dcdt}. +Based on the found use-cases, we formulate the functional and non-functional requirements for the predictive \gls{dcdt} reference architecture. To answer \emph{RQ\textsubscript{2}} we closely follow the \textit{AtLarge Design Process} \cite{DBLP:conf/icdcs/IosupVTETBFMT19} under the guidance of the supervisor, and propose a simulation-based \gls{dcdt} system that meets the requirements listed as a part of \emph{RQ\textsubscript{1}}. Firstly, following the literature review, we list the functional and non-functional requirements of a predictive \gls{dcdt}. |
