fix: fixed figure 5.4 rate --> ratios

2 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/content/evaluation.tex b/content/evaluation.tex
index a0a6617..0498ff7 100644
--- a/content/evaluation.tex
+++ b/content/evaluation.tex
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ The results are in \Cref{fig:red_yellow_alarms,fig:alarms_vs_failures,fig:failur
 \begin{figure}[t]
 	\centering
 	\includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{images/alarms_vs_failures.pdf}
-	\caption[Total number of failures versus numbe rof alarms raised.]{Comparison between the total number of raised alarms and the ground truth failure distribution during a SURF month workload in the SURF-SARA cluster. The failure trace used in this plot models Gmail outage reports~\cite{DBLP:journals/tpds/TalluriNCKCBI26}.}
+	\caption[Total number of failures versus number of alarms raised.]{Comparison between the total number of raised alarms and the ground truth failure distribution during a SURF month workload in the SURF-SARA cluster. The failure trace used in this plot models Gmail outage reports~\cite{DBLP:journals/tpds/TalluriNCKCBI26}.}
 	\label{fig:alarms_vs_failures}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ Moreover, they conclude through DyTwin's experimental setup, Taheri \etal achiev
 In our experiment, the numbers differ significantly.
 \begin{figure}[t]
 	\centering
-	\includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{images/failure_detecton_rate.pdf}
+	\includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{images/failure_detecton_rate2.pdf}
 	\caption[Failure detection rate overview.]{In this figure we show the total failure detection rate (\textcolor{Thistle}{\ding{110} \textbf{\sffamily Red + Yellow Alarms / Total Failures}}).
 		Our results are much different from DyTwin's performance~\cite{DBLP:conf/sc/TaheriBPRHDEWPM24}.
 		We believe this is due to the irreconcilable differences between our experimental setups.}
diff --git a/images/failure_detecton_rate2.pdf b/images/failure_detecton_rate2.pdf
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ca66dae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/images/failure_detecton_rate2.pdf