merge: Migrate to flow-based simulation for low-level models

This pull request converts the `opendc-simulator-resources` module into a flow
simulator and adapts the existing low-level models (e.g., CPU, network, disk)
to this new flow simulator.

The flow simulator works differently from the uniform resource consumption
model, in that it models flow through a system of connections, as opposed to
resource consumptions. Concretely, this means that while in the uniform
resource consumption model, consumptions with the same usage are propagated to
the resources, in the flow simulator, only changes to the flow in the system
are propagated. 

Overall, this leads to less updates in the system and therefore higher
performance. The benchmarks shows that the new implementation obtains more than
double the performance of the old implementation. We have focused in the new
implementation on reducing the amount of work and memory
allocations/loads/stores per updates.

* Migrate from kotlinx-benchmark to jmh-gradle (for better profiling support)
* Use longer traces for benchmarks (to prevent measuring the benchmark
overhead)
* Use direct field access for perf-sensitive code
* Combine work and deadline to duration
* Add support for pushing flow from context (to eliminate the allocation for
every `SimResourceCommand`)
* Reduce memory allocations in SimResourceInterpreter, by revamping the way
timers are allocated.
* Simplify max-min aggregator implementation (by utilizing the new push
mechanism) 
* Invoke consumer callback on every invalidation (in order to propagate changes
downstream)
* Lazily push changes to resource context (by not updating the flow rate
immediately after a push, but only after an update)
* Remove onUpdate callback 
* Merge distributor and aggregator into switch 
* Separate push and pull flags 
* Remove failure callback from FlowSource 
* Create separate callbacks for remaining events 
* Make convergence callback optional
* Reduce field accesses in FlowConsumerContextImpl
* Optimize hot path in SimTraceWorkload
* Expose CPU time counters directly on hypervisor 
* Optimize telemetry collection

**Breaking API Changes**

* The entire `opendc-simulator-resources` module has been replaced by the
`opendc-simulator-flow` module.
* `SimHypervisor.Listener` has been removed in favour of a new interface that
exposes the performance counters of the hypervisor directly. To listen for
convergence, use `FlowConvergenceListener`.

1 files changed, 15 insertions, 15 deletions

diff --git a/opendc-compute/opendc-compute-simulator/src/test/kotlin/org/opendc/compute/simulator/SimHostTest.kt b/opendc-compute/opendc-compute-simulator/src/test/kotlin/org/opendc/compute/simulator/SimHostTest.kt
index e75c31a0..26089b6d 100644
--- a/opendc-compute/opendc-compute-simulator/src/test/kotlin/org/opendc/compute/simulator/SimHostTest.kt
+++ b/opendc-compute/opendc-compute-simulator/src/test/kotlin/org/opendc/compute/simulator/SimHostTest.kt
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ import org.opendc.simulator.compute.model.ProcessingNode
 import org.opendc.simulator.compute.model.ProcessingUnit
 import org.opendc.simulator.compute.workload.SimTraceWorkload
 import org.opendc.simulator.core.runBlockingSimulation
-import org.opendc.simulator.resources.SimResourceInterpreter
+import org.opendc.simulator.flow.FlowEngine
 import org.opendc.telemetry.compute.ComputeMetricExporter
 import org.opendc.telemetry.compute.HOST_ID
 import org.opendc.telemetry.compute.table.HostData
@@ -87,14 +87,14 @@ internal class SimHostTest {
             .setClock(clock.toOtelClock())
             .build()
 
-        val interpreter = SimResourceInterpreter(coroutineContext, clock)
+        val engine = FlowEngine(coroutineContext, clock)
         val virtDriver = SimHost(
             uid = hostId,
             name = "test",
             model = machineModel,
             meta = emptyMap(),
             coroutineContext,
-            interpreter,
+            engine,
             meterProvider,
             SimFairShareHypervisorProvider()
         )
@@ -170,9 +170,9 @@ internal class SimHostTest {
         reader.close()
 
         assertAll(
-            { assertEquals(659, activeTime, "Active time does not match") },
-            { assertEquals(2342, idleTime, "Idle time does not match") },
-            { assertEquals(638, stealTime, "Steal time does not match") },
+            { assertEquals(658, activeTime, "Active time does not match") },
+            { assertEquals(1741, idleTime, "Idle time does not match") },
+            { assertEquals(637, stealTime, "Steal time does not match") },
             { assertEquals(1500001, clock.millis()) }
         )
     }
@@ -199,14 +199,14 @@ internal class SimHostTest {
             .setClock(clock.toOtelClock())
             .build()
 
-        val interpreter = SimResourceInterpreter(coroutineContext, clock)
+        val engine = FlowEngine(coroutineContext, clock)
         val host = SimHost(
             uid = hostId,
             name = "test",
             model = machineModel,
             meta = emptyMap(),
             coroutineContext,
-            interpreter,
+            engine,
             meterProvider,
             SimFairShareHypervisorProvider()
         )
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ internal class SimHostTest {
             host.spawn(server)
             delay(5000L)
             host.fail()
-            delay(5000L)
+            delay(duration * 1000)
             host.recover()
 
             suspendCancellableCoroutine<Unit> { cont ->
@@ -274,12 +274,12 @@ internal class SimHostTest {
         reader.close()
 
         assertAll(
-            { assertEquals(2661, idleTime, "Idle time does not match") },
-            { assertEquals(339, activeTime, "Active time does not match") },
-            { assertEquals(1195001, uptime, "Uptime does not match") },
-            { assertEquals(5000, downtime, "Downtime does not match") },
-            { assertEquals(1195000, guestUptime, "Guest uptime does not match") },
-            { assertEquals(5000, guestDowntime, "Guest downtime does not match") },
+            { assertEquals(1175, idleTime, "Idle time does not match") },
+            { assertEquals(624, activeTime, "Active time does not match") },
+            { assertEquals(900001, uptime, "Uptime does not match") },
+            { assertEquals(300000, downtime, "Downtime does not match") },
+            { assertEquals(900000, guestUptime, "Guest uptime does not match") },
+            { assertEquals(300000, guestDowntime, "Guest downtime does not match") },
         )
     }