summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/public/posts/:w
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'public/posts/:w')
-rw-r--r--public/posts/:w45
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 45 deletions
diff --git a/public/posts/:w b/public/posts/:w
deleted file mode 100644
index f53d870..0000000
--- a/public/posts/:w
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
-+++
-date = '2025-09-12T23:08:15+02:00'
-draft = false
-title = 'Denounce AI'
-+++
-
-Recently I have read a blog post by [Jamie Zawinski](https://www.jwz.org/) on [Anthony Moser's opinion](https://anthonymoser.github.io/writing/ai/haterdom/2025/08/26/i-am-an-ai-hater.html) about the current developments in AI.
-Now I want to try to formulate my own arguments against the overwhelming reliance on AI nowadays.
-It's been my point of view for a while, however I would like to now clearly state why I think the direction the technology world is heading is wrong.
-
-AI, although currently being hyped beyond reason, has been around since the previous century.
-However, with the release of ChatGPT to the public, generative models have entered the lives of everyone.
-As a Computer Science student I have first hand witnessed the effects of a paradigm shift in many domains, and after 2 years I believe that relying on content generated by artificial intelligence is simply harmful.
-
-As an avid fan of english literature I really like reading well-written books.
-It is a great feeling to be able to appreciate the intricacies of the language and the craftsmanship of the author, who has taken the time (sometimes decades) to write about a certain topic.
-If you read a lot, you can often tell a well-written book from a poorly constructed one, and if enough people realize this, the society awards great writers with prizes and honors.
-However, with the rise of large language models, essays, books, novels and much more can be created with a single prompt to the model.
-While the quality of such writing can often be questionable, it's important to realize that this takes away the very essence and purpose of writing in the first place.
-When you put pen to paper you both try to advance your own thinking and convey your feelings and views to a broader audience.
-It is your opinion and findings that matter, and this is by no means a trivial process.
-Using artificial intelligence to write for you, or help you write, or correct your writing defeats the purpose of writing something in the first place.
-This is also the right moment to point out the current concerns regarding this for the book authors and artist of any other kind as well.
-AI is slowly getting better and better at this kind of work, rendering virtually impossible for me right now to distinguish e.g., electronic music generated by AI and created by humans.
-This poses a threat to the literature and artistic community, and by proxy, to readers and everyone interested in art.
-I consciously cannot use such technology knowing that it displaces the very people I admire the work of.
-
-What is even more interesting, is that many large language models are trained on books, which are later completely discarded and thrown out.
-Anthropic, the company behind the Claude AI model, has destroyed millions of print books to train their AI.
-[Here](https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/06/anthropic-destroyed-millions-of-print-books-to-build-its-ai-models/) is a very good article about this.
-In essence, to train the AI, one must scan the books first, preferably quickly.
-According to Anthropic, the most efficient way to go about this is to strip the books of their cover, rip out the pages and scan just the paper itself.
-This destroys the books, which are later thrown out.
-It's a good moment to ask oneself -- is this what I'd like to happen to my book, if I ever wrote one?
-
-
-I think the point made by [Hayao Miyazaki](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hayao_Miyazaki), the studio Ghibli founder behind some of the best animated movies of the last century summarizes it pretty well.
-Recently there has been a viral video going on of him saying in 2016 how he believes AI to be _an insult to life itself_.
-As strong of an opinion as it is, I sympathize with his standpoint of view.
-Being an artist and designer, seeing your life's work being completely overtaken by soulless software must be terrifying.
-
-I will probably be updating this blog post to review my arguments and add on top of everything.
-Maybe who knows, one day I might change my mind, but if it happens so, I will for sure write another post about it.
-Thanks for reading!
-