summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/main.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'main.tex')
-rw-r--r--main.tex34
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/main.tex b/main.tex
index 6cc066b..ab51130 100644
--- a/main.tex
+++ b/main.tex
@@ -92,23 +92,30 @@
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}\frametitle{\textbf{RQ2}: Reference Architecture}
+ % Make Kafka logos clearly defined --> add a legend with icons?
+ \hspace{-0.3cm}
\begin{minipage}[b]{0.45\linewidth}
- \begin{tcolorbox}[title=Implementation]
- %Add the _implementation_ figure here instead.
- % I.e., the Kafka, the broker, PostgreSQL, Redis.
- % In the implementation graph: keep the datacenter "just" a datacenter -- don't yet mention we use OpenDC.
- % Make Kafka logos clearly defined --> add a legend with icons?
- \end{tcolorbox}
- \vspace{1cm}
+ \begin{center}
+ % Change to Datacenter (Physical Twin)
+ \includegraphics[width=1.15\textwidth]{images/ref_architecture.pdf}
+ \end{center}
+ \vspace{-0.2cm}
+ \tiny
+ \textbf{Figure 1.4:} The predictive datacenter digital twin reference architecture.
+ The architecture was designed with the \emph{AtLarge Design Process}~\cite{DBLP:conf/icdcs/IosupVTETBFMT19}.
+ \vspace{0.2cm}
\end{minipage}
+ \hspace{0.8cm}
\begin{minipage}[b]{0.45\linewidth}
\begin{center}
- % Change to Datacenter (Physical Twin)
- \includegraphics[width=1.25\textwidth]{images/ref_architecture.pdf}
+ \includegraphics[width=1.15\linewidth]{images/implementation.png}
\end{center}
\vspace{-0.2cm}
\tiny
- \textbf{Figure 1.4:} The predictive datacenter digital twin reference architecture. \end{minipage}
+ \textbf{Figure 1.5:} The prototype based on \textbf{Figure 1.4} towards answering \textbf{RQ3}.
+ The time-series data flows first to the \texttt{Grafana} dashboard, \texttt{PostgreSQL} database and \texttt{Redis} cache, as advised in~\cite{DBLP:conf/sc/TaheriBPRHDEWPM24}.
+ \end{minipage}
+
% We decided to use discrete-event simulation, as opposed to computational fluid dynamics because of the high overheads of development time needed for CFD.
% CFD simply takes too long to run, making it unfeasible for real-time analytics and simulation.
% Citing ExaDigit: [CFD] they are also more computationally expensive, generally making real-time operation unfeasible.
@@ -116,13 +123,10 @@
\end{frame}
% You should skip \hfill completely or in favour of \hspace very minimally.
\begin{frame}\frametitle{\textbf{RQ3}: Experimental Setup}
- % The software stack of \emph{Sunfish} includes state-of-the-art software.
- %The time-series data flows first to the \texttt{Grafana} dashboard, \texttt{PostgreSQL} database and \texttt{Redis} cache, as advised in~\cite{DBLP:conf/sc/TaheriBPRHDEWPM24}.
-
\begin{minipage}[b]{0.45\linewidth}
\begin{tcolorbox}[title=Problem, colbacktitle=red!70!black,colback=red!20!white]
We cannot just go and test digital twins on large systems, because we do not have large systems at hand.
- Moreover, real-world experimentation is costly and unsustainable in the long run~\cite{DBLP:conf/ccgrid/MastenbroekAJLB21}.
+ Moreover, real-world experimentation is costly and unsustainable in the long run~\cite{DBLP:conf/ccgrid/MastenbroekAJLB21}.
\end{tcolorbox}
\vspace{0.5cm}
\begin{tcolorbox}[title=Solution, colbacktitle=Green!70!black, colback=Green!20!white]
@@ -140,7 +144,7 @@
\end{center}
\tiny
\vspace{-0.2cm}
- \textbf{Figure 1.5:} The experimental setup.
+ \textbf{Figure 1.6:} The experimental setup.
Answering \textbf{RQ3} we provide a novel way to evaluate datacenter digital twins through discrete-event simulation.
\end{minipage}
\end{frame}