From 95abbb9948ab7c8d4fe62aa9284c2abeced0515b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mjkwiatkowski Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2026 16:43:45 +0200 Subject: feat: completed the second iteration over the introduction and conclusion --- sources/dt_features_comparison.tex | 2 +- sources/failure_models.tex | 26 ++++++++++ sources/simulator_comparison.tex | 4 +- sources/thesis_structure.drawio | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 4 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) create mode 100644 sources/failure_models.tex (limited to 'sources') diff --git a/sources/dt_features_comparison.tex b/sources/dt_features_comparison.tex index 788382d..ee849c8 100644 --- a/sources/dt_features_comparison.tex +++ b/sources/dt_features_comparison.tex @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ \bottomrule \end{tabular} } - \caption{Comparison of selected datacenter digital twins. \textbf{Modelling capability:} {3D = Visualizations}; {CH = Cooling/Heat}, PE = Power/Energy Consumption, A = Anomaly Detection, N = Network Modelling, SE = Scenario Exploration, VP = Virtual Prototyping, FD = Federation, RA = Resource Allocation; \textbf{Data Analytics}: $\ddagger$ = Predictive Analysis; $\star$ = Descriptive Analysis, $\dagger$ = Prescriptive Analysis.} + \caption[Comparison of selected datacenter digital twins.]{Comparison of selected datacenter digital twins. \textbf{Modelling capability:} {3D = Visualizations}; {CH = Cooling/Heat}, PE = Power/Energy Consumption, A = Anomaly Detection, N = Network Modelling, SE = Scenario Exploration, VP = Virtual Prototyping, FD = Federation, RA = Resource Allocation; \textbf{Data Analytics}: $\ddagger$ = Predictive Analysis; $\star$ = Descriptive Analysis, $\dagger$ = Prescriptive Analysis.} \label{tab:dt_features_comparison} \end{table} % Autonomous decisions (autonomous twinning) from~\cite{DBLP:conf/sc/BrewerMKWBHSGGW24} is inherent to digital twinning -- it is better left unsaid in the table. diff --git a/sources/failure_models.tex b/sources/failure_models.tex new file mode 100644 index 0000000..63fa119 --- /dev/null +++ b/sources/failure_models.tex @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +\begin{table}[t] + \centering + \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.4} + \resizebox{\columnwidth}{!}{ + \begin{tabular}{lllllllll} + \toprule + & \multicolumn{4}{c}{\textbf{Availability intervals}} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{\textbf{Unavailability intervals}} \\ + \cmidrule(lr){2-5} \cmidrule(l){6-9} + \textbf{Trace} & \textbf{Exp($\mu$)} & \textbf{Wbl($k, \lambda$)} & \textbf{LogN($\mu,\sigma$)} & \textbf{Gam($k, \lambda$)} & \textbf{Exp($\mu$)} & \textbf{Wbl($k, \lambda$)} & \textbf{LogN($\mu, \sigma$)} & \textbf{Gam($k, \lambda$)} \\ + lanl05 & 1779.99 & 048 816.60 & 5.56 2.39 & 0.35 5102.71 & 5.92 & 0.58 2.18 & 0.05 1.42 & 0.38 15.44 \\ + g5k06 & 31.41 & 0.48 14.37 & 1.51 2.42 & 0.34 94.35 & 7.41 & 0.35 0.47 & -2.00 2.20 & 0.19 39.92 \\ + microsoft99 & 67.01 & 0.55 35.30 & 2.62 1.84 & 0.41 162.19 & 16.49 & 0.60 9.34 & 1.42 1.54 & 0.46 35.52 \\ + websites02 & 11.85 & 0.46 3.68 & 0.23 2.02 & 0.31 38.67 & 1.18 & 0.65 0.61 & -1.12 1.13 & 0.50 2.37 \\ + pl05 & 159.49 & 0.33 19.35 & 1.44 2.86 & 0.20 788.03 & 49.61 & 0.36 5.59 & 0.40 2.45 & 0.21 237.65 \\ + ldns04 & 141.06 & 0.51 79.30 & 3.25 2.33 & 0.39 362.43 & 8.61 & 0.63 5.62 & 0.91 1.64 & 0.51 16.87 \\ + overnet03 & 2.29 & 0.85 2.04 & 0.19 0.98 & 0.91 2.53 & 12.00 & 0.44 2.98 & 0.08 1.80 & 0.29 41.64 \\ + nd07cpu & 13.73 & 0.45 4.16 & 0.30 2.20 & 0.30 46.16 & 4.25 & 0.51 0.74 & -1.02 1.27 & 0.28 15.07 \\ + skype06 & 16.27 & 0.64 10.86 & 1.60 1.57 & 0.53 30.79 & 14.31 & 0.63 9.48 & 1.40 1.73 & 0.50 28.53 \\ + + \bottomrule + \end{tabular} + } + \caption[The failure models table.]{The failure models table, by Javadi \etal~\cite{DBLP:journals/jpdc/JavadiKIE13}.} + \label{tab:failure_models_table} +\end{table} + diff --git a/sources/simulator_comparison.tex b/sources/simulator_comparison.tex index 4014ad0..2679b48 100644 --- a/sources/simulator_comparison.tex +++ b/sources/simulator_comparison.tex @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ \bottomrule \end{tabular} } - \caption{Comparison of selected datacenter simulators. \textbf{Models:} VC = VMs and containers; N = Network, S = Storage, E = Energy, CM = Cost Models, FS = FaaS, ML = Machine Learning, WF = Workflows, FD = Federation; \textbf{Phenomena:} F = Failures, PI = Performance interface; \textbf{Tools:} EXP = Experiment automation; \textbf{Support:} \ding{51} = Yes, \ding{55} = No; $\dagger$ = extension, not integrated; $\star$ = advanced, carefully calibrated feature. Author: Mastenbroek \etal~\cite{DBLP:conf/ccgrid/MastenbroekAJLB21}} - \label{tab:datacenter_simulator_comparison} + \caption[Comparison of selected datacenter simulators.]{Comparison of selected datacenter simulators. \textbf{Models:} VC = VMs and containers; N = Network, S = Storage, E = Energy, CM = Cost Models, FS = FaaS, ML = Machine Learning, WF = Workflows, FD = Federation; \textbf{Phenomena:} F = Failures, PI = Performance interface; \textbf{Tools:} EXP = Experiment automation; \textbf{Support:} \ding{51} = Yes, \ding{55} = No; $\dagger$ = extension, not integrated; $\star$ = advanced, carefully calibrated feature. Author: Mastenbroek \etal~\cite{DBLP:conf/ccgrid/MastenbroekAJLB21}} + \label{tab:datacenter_simulator_comparison} \end{table} diff --git a/sources/thesis_structure.drawio b/sources/thesis_structure.drawio index 8ef3faa..eef2415 100644 --- a/sources/thesis_structure.drawio +++ b/sources/thesis_structure.drawio @@ -1,33 +1,44 @@ - + + + + - + - + - - + + - - + + - + + + + + + + + + @@ -37,50 +48,38 @@ - + - + - + - - - - - - - + - - + + - - + + - - - - - - - - + + - - + + @@ -88,6 +87,45 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + -- cgit v1.2.3