diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'public/posts/denounce-ai/index.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | public/posts/denounce-ai/index.html | 90 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 90 deletions
diff --git a/public/posts/denounce-ai/index.html b/public/posts/denounce-ai/index.html deleted file mode 100644 index dae7e32..0000000 --- a/public/posts/denounce-ai/index.html +++ /dev/null @@ -1,90 +0,0 @@ -<head> - <meta charset="utf-8"> - <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"> - <link rel="icon" type="image/png" sizes="32x32" href="/images/favicon-32x32.png"> - <link rel="icon" type="image/png" sizes="16x16" href="/images/favicon-16x16.png"> - <link rel="manifest" href="/images/site.webmanifest"> - <link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/style.css" /> - <link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/fonts.css" /> - <script async type="text/javascript" src="js/code.js"> </script> -</head> - -<div class="container"> - <ul id="bar"> - - <li> - <a href="/">go back</a> - </li> - <li>|</li> - - <li> - <a href="mailto:mati.rewa@gmail.com">mati.rewa@gmail.com</a> - </li> - <li>|</li> - <li> - <a href="https://git.denounce.ai/">git.denounce.ai</a> - </li> - <li>|</li> - <li> - <a href="https://ohmyghost.nl">ohmyghost.nl</a> - </li> - <li>|</li> - <li> - <a href="https://atlarge-research.com/mkwiatkowski/">research</a> - </li> - <li>|</li> - <li> - book blog - </li> -</ul> - - -</div> -</div> -<div class="container"> - <h2>Denounce AI</h2> - <p>Recently I have read a blog post by <a href="https://www.jwz.org/">Jamie Zawinski</a> on <a href="https://anthonymoser.github.io/writing/ai/haterdom/2025/08/26/i-am-an-ai-hater.html">Anthony Moser’s opinion</a> about the current developments in AI. -Now I want to try to formulate my own arguments against the overwhelming reliance on AI nowadays. -It’s been my point of view for a while, however I would like to now clearly state why I think the direction the technology world is heading is wrong.</p> -<p>AI, although currently being hyped beyond reason, has been around since the previous century. -However, with the release of ChatGPT to the public, generative models have entered the lives of everyone. -As a Computer Science student I have first hand witnessed the effects of a paradigm shift in many domains, and after 2 years I believe that relying on content generated by artificial intelligence is simply harmful.</p> -<p>As an avid fan of english literature I really like reading well-written books. -It is a great feeling to be able to appreciate the intricacies of the language and the craftsmanship of the author, who has taken the time (sometimes decades) to write about a certain topic. -If you read a lot, you can often tell a well-written book from a poorly constructed one, and if enough people realize this, the society awards great writers with prizes and honors. -However, with the rise of large language models, essays, books, novels and much more can be created with a single prompt to the model. -While the quality of such writing can often be questionable, it’s important to realize that this takes away the very essence and purpose of writing in the first place. -When you put pen to paper you both try to advance your own thinking and convey your feelings and views to a broader audience. -It is your opinion and findings that matter, and this is by no means a trivial process. -Using artificial intelligence to write for you, or help you write, or correct your writing defeats the purpose of writing something in the first place. -This is also the right moment to point out the current concerns regarding this for the book authors and artist of any other kind as well. -AI is slowly getting better and better at this kind of work, rendering virtually impossible for me right now to distinguish e.g., electronic music generated by AI and created by humans. -This poses a threat to the literature and artistic community, and by proxy, to readers and everyone interested in art. -I consciously cannot use such technology knowing that it displaces the very people I admire the work of.</p> -<p>What is even more interesting is that many large language models are trained on books, which are later completely discarded and thrown out. -Anthropic, the company behind the Claude AI model, has destroyed millions of print books to train their AI. -<a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/06/anthropic-destroyed-millions-of-print-books-to-build-its-ai-models/">Here</a> is a very good article about this. -In essence, to train the AI, one must scan the books first, preferably quickly. -According to Anthropic, the most efficient way to go about this is to strip the books of their cover, rip out the pages and scan just the printed paper. -This irreversibly destroys the books, which are later thrown out. -It’s a good moment to ask oneself – is this what I’d like to happen to my book, if I ever wrote one? -I will not raise the ethics concerns behind such actions, it’s also not my aim to start a debate about this. -However, I think the question above is worth asking to yourself.</p> -<p>I think the point made by <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hayao_Miyazaki">Hayao Miyazaki</a>, the studio Ghibli founder behind some of the best animated movies of the last century summarizes it pretty well. -Recently there has been a viral video going on of him saying in 2016 how he believes AI to be <em>an insult to life itself</em>. -As strong of an opinion as it is, I sympathize with his standpoint of view. -Being an artist and designer, seeing your life’s work being completely overtaken by soulless software must be terrifying.</p> - -</div> -<footer style="vertical-align: bottom;"> - <div style="display: inline-block; margin-left:15px;"> - <center> - - © Copyright 2024-2025 Mateusz J. Kwiatkowski. All Rights Reserved. - - </center> - </div> -</footer> -</body> -</html> - |